Hearing on "The Martin's Cove Land Transfer Act"
May 6, 2002
The Honorable George Radanovich
Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks,
Recreation, and Public Lands
House Committee on Resources
1333 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Chairman Radanovich:
As president of the Society for American Archaeology, I would
like to submit the following remarks for the record of the
subcommittee's May 4 hearing on "The Martin's Cove Land Transfer
Act" (H.R. 4103). The SAA respectfully opposes this bill
because, although the site in question is sacred to the Church,
other national cultural heritage resources would be affected by
the sale; the Church already has sufficient access to the site
and currently manages an interpretive trail there; and it would
establish a precedent for the purchase of public lands
considered sacred by private groups and individuals with the
potential loss of public access to and research of important
national cultural resources, both known and yet to be
discovered.
SAA is an international organization that, since its founding in
1934, has been dedicated to the research, interpretation, and
protection of the archaeological heritage of the Americas. With
more than 6500 members, the Society represents professional
archaeologists in colleges and universities, museums, government
agencies, and the private sector. The SAA has members in all 50
states as well as many other nations around the world.
H.R. 4103 would provide for the sale of a National Register
site, Martin's Cove (48NA210), located on Bureau of Land
Management property in central Wyoming, to the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Although historians disagree on
the exact location, Martin's Cove is regarded as a sacred site
by the Church. For the past several years, the Church has
sought to acquire the land, but has not been able to arrive at a
settlement that the BLM finds satisfactory. Recently, the
Church has sought to mandate the sale of the property through
congressional action.
The SAA has serious concerns about how cultural resources at and
near Martin's Cove would be affected by transfer to private
ownership. Several prehistoric Native American sites are known
to exist on the property; since the property has not been
completely inventoried, additional sites can be expected. The
sale would endanger access to those sites for future
investigation and research. In addition, the impact of the sale
of Martin's Cove on the condition of, and access to, other sites
and resources such as Seminoe's Fort and the Devil's Gate are
unknown and potentially harmful. For example, the Sun Ranch, a
National Historic Landmark owned by the Church and that
encircles Martin's Cove has experienced severe strain on those
attributes that gave it its National Historic Landmark status
from developments built to serve bus and tour groups visiting
the Cove.
The Church's present and future access to the site is not in
question. For the past five years, the BLM and the Church have
participated in a cooperative agreement for the purpose of
constructing an interpretive trail and other improvements to
ensure protection, management and development of cultural
resources in the Martin's Cove area.
Additionally, there is some question as to whether the bill
complies with the National Historic Preservation Act. If this
land sale is permitted, and we urge that it not be, it is
imperative that several covenants be placed on the sale and that
these be specifically included in the proposed legislation:
-
A complete archaeological survey must be
conducted in compliance with section 106 of the
NHPA. The land has not been completely surveyed
for cultural properties; a previous survey
located several National Register-eligible sites
along the current interpretive trail
right-of-way and it is expected that there will
be others along this piece of river bottomland;
-
Other activities required by Section 106 of the
NHPA will have to be undertaken, including
consultation with Native American tribes;
-
In addition, the BLM should require that any
further interpretive trails meet with BLM
approval to ensure a complete and unbiased
presentation of the trails' varied histories.
Most troubling is a potential precedent that could be set by
enactment of this bill. The SAA is greatly concerned that the
sale of public land, especially land containing a National
Register site, to a private group on the basis of the land's
religious importance will encourage religious and other groups
to petition the government to sell lands and sites considered
important to their faiths and cultural identities. Even if
enactment of H.R. 4103 does not create binding court precedent,
the possibility exists that future Congresses could be placed
under heavy political pressure to pass similar measures. Such a
situation could result in the loss of public access to numerous
areas that hold or could hold archaeological and cultural
resources important to the discovery, interpretation, and
preservation of the Nation's heritage.
The SAA urges the rejection of H.R. 4103. Since the Church has
publicly expressed concern that BLM might change its rules or
attitude toward the Church's current use of the property, as
an alternative, we urge Congressman Hansen to bring the Church
and BLM together to negotiate a new, longer-term agreement that
meets the concerns of the church while retaining this National
Historic site in public ownership.
I appreciate this opportunity to present SAA's views
Sincerely,
Robert L. Kelly
President
|