Behavioral Archaeology:Some Clarifications
Michael Brian Schiffer
Abstract
In their comment on Schiffer (1996), Broughton and O'Connell perpetuate several common misconceptions about behavioral archaeology. This brief reply clarifies the character and goals of behavioral archaeology and indicates that this vigorous program is now beginning to produce "social" theory beyond the explanation of variability in artifact designs.
Resumen
En su commentario sobre Schiffer (1996) Broughton y O'Connel (1998) perpetúan varios malentendidos comunes sobre la arqueología conductal e indica que su vigoroso programa está empezando a producir teoría "social" que va más allá de la explicación de variabilidad en el diseño de artefactos.
This is site is best viewed with
Internet Explorer version 5.1 and above or
Netscape Navigator version 6 and above.
For all web related problems, please
contact us at
webmaster@saa.org.
